BC STORIES

Canada’s Time Crisis: Why British Columbia is Ending the Clock Change While Others Wait for a Domino Effect

British Columbia is ending seasonal time changes permanently, but the rest of Canada remains locked in a collective action dilemma over daylight saving time.

Published

on

The Last ‘Spring Forward’ for British Columbia

As Canadians across the country prepare to nudge their clocks forward one hour this Sunday, residents of British Columbia are doing so with a unique sense of finality. Premier David Eby confirmed this week that the province is moving forward with a long-awaited plan to adopt permanent, year-round daylight saving time. The move marks the end of a decades-long debate in the Pacific province, effectively terminating the biannual ritual of ‘springing forward’ and ‘falling back’ that has governed Canadian life for generations.

The decision is rooted in both public health and overwhelming popular demand. Premier Eby highlighted the practical disruptions caused by the shift, noting that children and pets do not recognize the arbitrary change in time, leading to lost sleep for parents and increased stress for families. “When we change our clocks twice a year, it creates all kinds of problems,” Eby stated during the announcement. Beyond mere inconvenience, the Premier pointed to a spike in car accidents and a general decline in public well-being as primary drivers for the policy shift.

A History of Public Mandate and Political Stalling

British Columbia’s road to permanent daylight time has been long. In 2019, the province conducted one of the most successful public consultations in its history, with a staggering 93 per cent of the 223,000 respondents indicating they wanted to scrap the time change. While former premier John Horgan attempted to implement the change several times, the province initially hesitated, hoping to maintain alignment with southern neighbors in Washington, Oregon, and California.

However, B.C. has now decided to lead the charge. This bold move highlights a growing frustration with what political scientists call a ‘collective action problem.’ Peter Graefe, a political scientist at McMaster University, suggests that many jurisdictions are waiting for a leader to prove that the transition can be seamless. “Maybe it does take one place to move and it will have some impact in having other places saying, ‘Look, the sky didn’t fall, maybe we’ll try it as well,’” Graefe noted.

The Eastern Gridlock: Ontario and Quebec

In Central Canada, the situation is more complex. The Ontario legislature passed a bill in November 2020 that would end the time change, but with a significant caveat: the law only triggers if Quebec and New York State follow suit. This interdependence is driven by the need for economic and logistical synchronization, particularly regarding the stock markets and cross-border trade. Premier Doug Ford has expressed an openness to ending the practice, stating that Ontario will “eventually” stick with daylight saving time to stay in step with the rest of North America, but for now, the province remains in a holding pattern.

Quebec has similarly signaled that while they recognize the public desire to end the time change, no immediate legislative action is planned. Government officials in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Manitoba have also confirmed they are not currently pursuing a change, citing the need for regional alignment to avoid creating a patchwork of time zones that could disrupt travel and commerce.

The Prairie Divide

The debate remains particularly contentious in Alberta. In a 2021 municipal referendum, Albertans narrowly voted to keep the biannual change, with the ‘stay’ side winning by fewer than 3,000 votes. Despite this, the government led by Danielle Smith is re-examining the issue. Finance Minister Nate Horner recently suggested that the conversation is “probably coming towards us” again, as the government weighs the impact on airline schedules and professional sports against the potential health benefits.

Calgary Mayor Jyoti Gondek, however, has expressed skepticism about reopening the debate, suggesting that the narrow victory in 2021 should stand as a settled matter so that the government can focus on more pressing economic priorities.

The Biological Cost of Shifting Time

While the political debate focuses on trade and convenience, health experts are sounding the alarm on the biological toll of the time change. Rebecca Robillard, co-chair of the Canadian Sleep Research Consortium, argues that the issue is far more significant than losing a single hour of sleep. “It actually disrupts the alignment between the biological clock and the natural cycle of the sun,” she explained. This misalignment affects hormone release, insulin regulation, and metabolism.

Robillard points to a chilling list of ramifications associated with the time shift, including increased rates of stroke, heart attacks, mood swings, and even pregnancy complications. From a clinical perspective, the sudden shift forces the body into a state of ‘social jetlag’ that can take weeks to resolve.

The Counter-Argument: The Need for Morning Light

Despite the momentum for permanent daylight saving time, some experts warn of the downsides of year-round DST—specifically the loss of morning light in the winter. Patricia Lakin-Thomas, a professor at York University, notes that our circadian clocks are reset by morning light. Under permanent daylight saving time, some parts of Canada would not see the sun rise until nearly 10:00 a.m. in the middle of winter.

“Everybody loves the idea when you first announce it… but in the winter, we just hate it,” Lakin-Thomas warned. She argues that standard time is actually better for human health because it aligns more closely with the solar cycle, providing the morning light necessary to speed up our internal clocks and keep us in sync with the 24-hour day. As British Columbia embarks on this legislative experiment, the rest of the country—and the scientific community—will be watching closely to see if the benefits truly outweigh the costs.

Continue Reading

BC STORIES

Abbotsford-Mission candidates clash on spending, taxes and trust ahead of byelection

Abbotsford-Mission candidates sparred over PST expansion, spending, and party stability during a livestamed byelection debate ahead of the Sept. 26 vote.

Published

on

Candidates clash in livestreamed forum ahead of Sept. 26 vote

Tensions flared during a live 90-minute debate hosted by the Abbotsford Chamber of Commerce on Wednesday evening, where four Abbotsford-Mission candidates traded sharp criticisms over economic strategy, tax policies, and political stability.

NDP candidate Pam Alexis capped off the evening by targeting Conservative Party of BC candidate Kerry-Lynne Findley, claiming Findley is unfamiliar with the constituency and is focused on internal party conflicts rather than building a collaborative community. Findley had earlier criticized the ruling NDP on provincial spending, red tape, and an inability to balance B.C.’s budget.

Taxation and economic platforms take center stage

A primary point of contention was the expansion of B.C.’s PST to professional services starting Oct. 1. Findley voiced strong opposition, stating that local small business owners and seniors are distressed over growing tax burdens. She attributed the province’s rising debt and credit downgrade to Premier David Eby’s administration.

Alexis defended the expanded tax base, explaining it was necessary to maintain public services following the elimination of B.C.’s carbon tax. She assured voters that revenue raised would be managed responsibly.

During a candidate-to-candidate questioning period, Alexis pressed Findley on recent Conservative party instability, pointing to nine individuals—including Abbotsford South MLA Bruce Banman—who recently departed the party. Findley rejected the characterization that those individuals worked alongside her, attributing the exits to a competitive leadership race.

CentreBC candidate Lakhwinder Jhaj asked Alexis whether she would ever vote against an NDP budget, to which Alexis replied she would voice concerns privately within government rather than vote against her party. Findley seized on the response, advocating for greater public transparency. BC Green Party candidate Stephen Fowler urged more proactive environmental action, stating climate change drives costly flood and wildfire emergencies.

Common ground on infrastructure and flood mitigation

Despite sharp exchanges, candidates found consensus on several local issues. All four agreed that federal assistance is crucial to protect the riding from future flooding, and all supported expanding transit options to alleviate persistent highway congestion.

Additionally, both Findley and Alexis favored expanding mental health resources, supporting local food processing on Agricultural Land Reserve property, and opening inter-provincial trade barriers to bolster B.C.’s economy.

The byelection, scheduled for Saturday, Sept. 26, was triggered after former Conservative MLA Reann Gasper resigned her seat on Aug. 22 to allow Findley to seek the nomination following Findley’s move to party leadership. The debate was moderated by University of the Fraser Valley professor Hamish Telford. BC Libertarian Party candidate Jeff Monds did not participate.

Continue Reading

BC STORIES

Unusual Moored RV Raft Raises Bylaw Concerns and Social Media Buzz in South Surrey

A homemade RV raft moored on South Surrey’s Nicomekl River has drawn a city bylaw ticket, environmental concerns, and mixed reactions on social media.

Published

on

Bylaw Ticket Issued as Floating Vessel Draws Public Attention

A city bylaws infraction notice has been taped to a makeshift vessel recently launched on the Nicomekl River in South Surrey. The craft—constructed by securing a recreational vehicle atop a homemade raft composed of barrels, metal beams, plywood, and straps—is currently anchored near Nicomekl Portage Park and the old Elgin Road bridge, behind the Crescent Road Esso station.

Local Reactions Split Over Craft’s Launch and Safety

Reports circulating online indicate the structure was assembled in two days within the Portage Park parking lot before being lowered into the waterway using a crane. The vessel lacks a visible motor. When checked on the morning of Friday, Sept. 11, no occupant answered calls at the site.

The craft’s presence has generated varied commentary across local community groups. Some observers celebrated the initiative, with one poster writing, “Property tax free !!! Whoot whoot!” while another called the creator “Today’s Tom Sawyer.” Another user commended the effort, posting, “100% kudos for out of the box thinking and giving it a go. Here’s hoping he’s carefully studied all the appropriate regulations, sleeps in a lifejacket (and doesn’t park it in front of my view, lol! Pretty it ain’t).”

Others expressed strong skepticism regarding legality, environmental risks, and structural durability. Comments included “There is no way that is legal,” alongside inquiries such as, “Saw the crane about to launch it. Does it even have a motor?” Additional public discussions raised concerns about potential waste discharge, grey water management, and how the craft will handle incoming winter storms or rough water. Both Transport Canada and the City of Surrey have been contacted regarding the vessel.

Continue Reading

BC STORIES

Why Local Leaders Are Demanding Immediate Highway 1 Safety Changes After Fatal Crashes

B.C. politicians push for Highway 1 safety upgrades and increased police patrols between Chase and Alberta following three fatal crashes near Revelstoke.

Published

on

Elected Officials Demand Swift Action on Highway 1

Spurred by four recent vehicle collisions between Sicamous and Revelstoke that left three people dead and at least six injured over a 68-hour period, local politicians are urging B.C. Transportation and Transit Minister Mike Farnworth to act quickly on corridor safety.

Columbia River—Revelstoke MLA Scott McInnis and Kamloops—Shuswap—Central Rockies MP Mel Arnold sent separate letters on Friday, Sept. 4, calling for near-term safety upgrades along the stretch between Chase and the Alberta border. McInnis described the route as one of the most dangerous highway sections in North America, noting that residents are fearful while traveling to work or transporting their children.

Plea for Four-Laning and Increased Law Enforcement

Arnold, who has petitioned the federal government for increased funding to expand the largely two-lane corridor since 2016, emphasized that rising traffic volumes and the lack of passing lanes are serious concerns. He acknowledged geographical hurdles but stated that fatal crashes cannot simply be accepted as permanent reality.

In response, the Ministry of Transportation and Transit stated that it remains committed to highway safety, reliability, and capacity. Working alongside ICBC, the province has four-laned 125 kilometres—or 37 per cent—of Highway 1 under provincial jurisdiction between Kamloops and Alberta to reduce head-on crashes and improve passing opportunities. However, the ministry highlighted that travel safety relies on a combination of infrastructure design, vehicle safety, and driver behaviour, urging motorists to follow speed limits and adjust to road conditions.

Proposed Short-Term Solutions and Community Town Halls

To address ongoing high-risk driving behaviour such as speeding, aggressive passing, and tailgating, McInnis requested an immediate increase in BC Highway Patrol and RCMP presence along the Field-to-Sicamous corridor, noting local detachments in Revelstoke and Golden-Field are stretched thin.

McInnis also proposed immediate steps including enhanced traffic management, better incident response capacity, and commercial vehicle compliance reviews. He is scheduled to meet directly with Minister Farnworth on Sept. 23 and plans to host town hall sessions in Revelstoke and Golden to gather constituent feedback and ideas.

Continue Reading

Trending