POLITICS
Tony Abbott Eyes Return to Frontline Politics in Bid for Liberal Party Presidency
Former PM Tony Abbott is in the frame for the Liberal Party presidency, aiming to reform the party’s strategy and reclaim voters from One Nation.
The Return of a Conservative Icon
In a move that signals a significant shift toward the ideological right, former Prime Minister Tony Abbott is reportedly preparing a bid for the federal presidency of the Liberal Party. This potential return to the political center stage marks Abbott’s most high-profile role since his prime ministership ended in 2015. Supporters believe Abbott can provide the organizational discipline and ideological fire needed to reclaim the party’s dominance in Australian politics.
A Strategic Alliance with Angus Taylor
Abbott’s candidacy is closely linked with the current leadership of Angus Taylor. Together, they aim to reform the party’s organizational wing—responsible for fundraising, strategy, and campaigning—to better compete against the rising influence of One Nation. While some party members remain cautious of Abbott’s polarising history, Taylor has reportedly expressed confidence that the former leader would handle the role with the necessary discipline to avoid generating internal friction.
The Battle for the Liberal Soul
The quest for the presidency may not be a clear path for Abbott, as another former party leader, Alexander Downer, is also being considered for the position. The upcoming vote in late May follows the expected departure of current president John Olsen. Abbott’s pitch centers on democratizing the party and reducing the influence of factional powerbrokers, specifically targeting moderate elements in New South Wales that he believes have diluted the party’s conservative core.
Reclaiming the Right-Wing Base
The Liberal Party is currently facing a dual challenge: retaining moderate voters while preventing further leakage of its base to Pauline Hanson’s One Nation. Abbott, a prolific commentator and board member at Fox Corporation, remains a hero to the party’s conservative establishment. His advocates argue that his stance on migration and traditional values is perfectly timed to capitalize on a global trend toward populism and a backlash against progressive social policies. However, critics warn that doubling down on Abbott’s unapologetic agenda could alienate the centrist voters required to win a general election.
BC STORIES
Abbotsford-Mission candidates clash on spending, taxes and trust ahead of byelection
Abbotsford-Mission candidates sparred over PST expansion, spending, and party stability during a livestamed byelection debate ahead of the Sept. 26 vote.

Candidates clash in livestreamed forum ahead of Sept. 26 vote
Tensions flared during a live 90-minute debate hosted by the Abbotsford Chamber of Commerce on Wednesday evening, where four Abbotsford-Mission candidates traded sharp criticisms over economic strategy, tax policies, and political stability.
NDP candidate Pam Alexis capped off the evening by targeting Conservative Party of BC candidate Kerry-Lynne Findley, claiming Findley is unfamiliar with the constituency and is focused on internal party conflicts rather than building a collaborative community. Findley had earlier criticized the ruling NDP on provincial spending, red tape, and an inability to balance B.C.’s budget.
Taxation and economic platforms take center stage
A primary point of contention was the expansion of B.C.’s PST to professional services starting Oct. 1. Findley voiced strong opposition, stating that local small business owners and seniors are distressed over growing tax burdens. She attributed the province’s rising debt and credit downgrade to Premier David Eby’s administration.
Alexis defended the expanded tax base, explaining it was necessary to maintain public services following the elimination of B.C.’s carbon tax. She assured voters that revenue raised would be managed responsibly.
During a candidate-to-candidate questioning period, Alexis pressed Findley on recent Conservative party instability, pointing to nine individuals—including Abbotsford South MLA Bruce Banman—who recently departed the party. Findley rejected the characterization that those individuals worked alongside her, attributing the exits to a competitive leadership race.
CentreBC candidate Lakhwinder Jhaj asked Alexis whether she would ever vote against an NDP budget, to which Alexis replied she would voice concerns privately within government rather than vote against her party. Findley seized on the response, advocating for greater public transparency. BC Green Party candidate Stephen Fowler urged more proactive environmental action, stating climate change drives costly flood and wildfire emergencies.
Common ground on infrastructure and flood mitigation
Despite sharp exchanges, candidates found consensus on several local issues. All four agreed that federal assistance is crucial to protect the riding from future flooding, and all supported expanding transit options to alleviate persistent highway congestion.
Additionally, both Findley and Alexis favored expanding mental health resources, supporting local food processing on Agricultural Land Reserve property, and opening inter-provincial trade barriers to bolster B.C.’s economy.
The byelection, scheduled for Saturday, Sept. 26, was triggered after former Conservative MLA Reann Gasper resigned her seat on Aug. 22 to allow Findley to seek the nomination following Findley’s move to party leadership. The debate was moderated by University of the Fraser Valley professor Hamish Telford. BC Libertarian Party candidate Jeff Monds did not participate.
NATIONAL STORIES
Why Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre Is Taking Canada’s Case Directly to American Viewers
Pierre Poilievre told CNBC in New York that Canadians feel wounded by U.S. tariffs, while refusing to criticize Prime Minister Mark Carney on foreign soil.

Cross-Border Economic Advocacy in New York
During a visit to New York aimed at restoring standard trade relations, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre spoke with reporters on the American television network CNBC on Thursday. Poilievre expressed that Canadians are feeling “wounded” and “confused” after their economy became a primary target for U.S. President Donald Trump.
Highlighting the longstanding economic ties between the two nations, Poilievre stressed that tariff-free trade remains the proper path forward. While acknowledging that both countries have past grievances—pointing to previous American buy-America restrictions on subnational markets and tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber—he argued that both sides should sit down to resolve differences for mutual economic gain.
Refusing to Engage in Domestic Politics Abroad
When co-host Joe Kernen questioned him regarding Prime Minister Mark Carney’s good faith during recent trade negotiations, Poilievre declined to criticize the prime minister while outside the country. Emphasizing that domestic politics stops at the border, he stated that his mission in the U.S. was to advocate for Canada rather than score domestic political points. Co-host Kernen noted respect for Poilievre’s stance, observing that U.S. opposition politicians do not typically adhere to that convention.
Poilievre also refrained from faulting Canada’s national economic performance over the past decade when pressed by Kernen, choosing instead to highlight past policy successes across various government levels.
Building a North American Alliance
In a statement regarding his trip, Poilievre detailed plans to meet with business leaders and investors to protect jobs on both sides of the border. He described the American public as Canada’s greatest asset, noting his intention to make the case directly to them that open trade leads to greater safety, wealth, and affordability for both nations.
Looking toward broader global challenges, the Conservative leader cautioned that risks and rivals facing the U.S. are growing. He urged the United States to strengthen its Western alliance alongside nations committed to free speech, markets, and trade to form a secure continent through collaborative effort, rather than engaging in disputes with friendly allies.
Poilievre is extending his stay in New York through Friday for the 25th anniversary of 9/11 to honor victims and mark how both nations stood united following the attacks.
BC STORIES
Canada Choice: Pay the Price of Pivoting or Risk Economic Dependency on the U.S.
PM Mark Carney addresses Canadians as reciprocal tariffs take effect, warning trade pivot carries costs but protects B.C. and national workers.

Reciprocal Tariffs Take Effect
As Canada’s new reciprocal tariffs took effect on Tuesday, Prime Minister Mark Carney addressed Canadians in a video message, warning that shifting trade away from the United States will carry financial consequences. However, Carney emphasized that inaction would carry a significantly higher price for the nation.
The federal government’s tariffs match $27.8 billion in U.S. exports, with rates running between 15 and 50 per cent on select items previously targeted by Washington, including milk, cheese, honey, and hockey sticks. The move follows last month’s decision by Carney to walk away from bilateral negotiations after the U.S. set a deadline to impose 50 per cent tariffs on Canadian goods.
National Strategy and Sectoral Impacts
The trade friction has affected Canadian industries unevenly. U.S. trade actions have focused heavily on aluminum, steel, auto, and lumber sectors, creating major impacts for workers in British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec, while provinces like Saskatchewan and Alberta have seen less direct effect.
Carney stated that the retaliatory measures are necessary to shield workers, communities, and businesses rather than to escalate tensions. The prime minister added that the pivot toward new global trade partners aims to build long-term economic resilience and safeguard Canada’s trade independence and cultural protections.
Opposition Calls for Transparency
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, speaking in Regina on Sunday, urged the government to release full details of the rejected U.S. trade proposal. Poilievre argued that Canadians deserve complete transparency regarding the negotiations and called for Parliament to be recalled ahead of its planned Sept. 21 return date.
The trade dispute follows months of economic pressure, during which U.S. President Donald Trump suggested using economic force regarding Canada’s integration with the United States. Carney noted that the ongoing series of national video updates, which began last spring, will continue to keep the public informed on Canada’s trade stance.
-
6 days ago
Your Current 3 Day Forecast — September 5, 2026
-
7 days ago
Your Current 3 Day Forecast — September 4, 2026
-
3 days ago
Your Current 3 Day Forecast — September 8, 2026
-
LOCAL3 days ago
Why Canada’s New Counter-Tariffs May Hinder Local Businesses While Leaving Shoppers Unscathed
-
WORLD6 days ago
Why Many Canadians View the United States as an Enemy amid Trump Trade War
-
NATIONAL STORIES3 days ago
What to Know After a Veteran Vancouver Officer Denies Allegations in $3M Fraud Case
-
SPORTS6 days ago
BC Lions See Win Streak Snapped by Alouettes in 37-30 Loss
-
LOCAL4 days ago
Quebec Pause Campaign Trail for Cabinet Talks as U.S. Tariffs Loom